Mrs E Lamb v Z Seabrook T/a ZMS Inns Ltd: 1404689/2020
JUDGMENT
The complaint of entitlement to a redundancy payment is struck out.REASONS
[1]The claimant complains of entitlement to a redundancy payment.[2]Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to make an entitlement to redundancy payment complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore, the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so following the letter from the Tribunal dated 10 March 2021, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Employment Judge Roper Date: 28 April 2021 Judgment sent to the parties: 06 May 2021 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 1404689/2020 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs E Lamb Respondent: Zoe Seabrook T/a Zms Inns Ltd The claimant complains of unfair dismissal.[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]There the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment, the claim for a redundancy payment having already been struck out. Employment Judge Bax Date: 13 May 2021 Judgment and Reasons sent to the Parties: 19 May 2021 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 1404689/2020 1404868/2020 1405134/2020 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mrs E Lamb Respondent: Zoe Seabrook T/a Zms Inns Ltd[1]By a letter dated 21 July 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claims should not be struck out because They have not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claims are therefore struck out.