Mr F Rahuoja v Starway Ltd: 1404534/2019
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By an order dated 18th February 2022, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because• it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. Employment Judge Cadney Date: 25 March 2022 Judgment sent to the Parties: 08 April 2022 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No: 1404534/2019 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr F Rahuoja Respondent: Starway Ltd (in liquidation) Heard at: Bristol (by video – CVP) On: 18 May 2023 Before: Employment Judge Livesey Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Did not attend[1]The Claimant suffered unlawful deductions from his wages and the Respondent shall pay him the sum of £8,820.00.[2]The Claimant’s claim of unpaid holiday pay succeeds and the Respondent shall pay him the further sum of £949.85.[3]The Claimant’s complaint of breach of contract (unpaid notice) is dismissed.