Dr S Batchelor v Churchlake Care Partnership LLP: 1403768/2022
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant was unfairly dismissed, but only seeks a declaration to that effect, and does not seek compensation, reinstatement or re-engagement; and[2]The claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeds in respect of unpaid salary during July 2022 and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £6,666.87; and[3]The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeds and the respondent is also ordered to pay the claimant four weeks’ pay in the gross sum of £4,361.66. Employment Judge N J Roper Date: 15 May 2023 Judgment sent to Parties: 25 May 2023 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 1403768/2022 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS BETWEEN Claimant Respondent Dr Sarah Batchelor AND Churchlake Care Partnership LLP[1]The claimant was unfairly dismissed, but only seeks a declaration to that effect, and does not seek compensation, reinstatement or re-engagement; and[2]The claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeds in respect of unpaid salary during July 2022 and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £6,666.87; and[3]THE CLAIMANT’S CLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT SUCCEEDS AND THE RESPONDENT IS ORDERED TO PAY THE CLAIMANT ONE MONTH’S PAY IN THE SUM OF £6,666.87; AND[4]The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeds and the respondent is also ordered to pay the claimant four weeks’ pay in the gross sum of £4,361.66. Employment Judge N J Roper Dated 15 May 2023 Amended Judgment sent to Parties: 05 July 2023 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 1403768/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Dr Sarah Batchelor First Respondent: Churchlake Care Partnership LLP Second Respondent: Mr Alan Jebson Third Respondent: Lakeland Care Services Partnership LLP Heard at: Bristol (video hearing by CVP) On: 25, 26 and 27 September 2023 Before: Employment Judge Street Appearances For the Claimant: in person For the First Respondent: no appearance For the Second Respondent: in person For the Third Respondent: no appearance