Mr J King v G Crook and Sons: 1403717/2019
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a Claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The Claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the Claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The Claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of Unfair Dismissal is struck out. The Claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this Judgment. ----------------------------------------- Employment Judge Dawson Date: 11 October 2019 Case Number: 1403717/2019 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr J King v Mr G Crook and Sons Heard at: Southampton On: 28 February 2020 Before: Employment Judge Rayner Appearances For the Claimant: Mr J King in person For the Respondent: Mr N Sampson (HR Manager for Respondent)[1]The Respondent has made an unlawful deduction from the wages of the Claimant of £2328.50 net.[2]The Respondent will pay the Claimant the net sum of £2328.50. ___________________________ Employment Judge Rayner Dated: 28 February 2020 ………………………………… Case Number: 1403717/2019 2 Note: online publication of judgments and reasons The ET is required to maintain a register of all judgments and written reasons. The register must be accessible to the public. It has recently been moved online. All judgments and reasons since February 2017 are now available at: https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. The ET has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in any way prior to publication, you will need to apply to the ET for an order to that effect under Rule 50 of the ET's Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to be copied to all other parties for comment and it would be carefully scrutinised by a judge (where appropriate, with panel members) before deciding whether (and to what extent) anonymity should be granted to a party or a witness