Miss E Lake v Somerset Tavern Ltd: 1403508/2022
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated the 24th April 2023, the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because the respondent had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated the 6th February 2023 it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.[1]The response is struck out pursuant to rule 37 on the grounds that the respondent has failed to comply with case management orders and/or the response is not actively pursued.[2]A proper evaluation of the claim of unfair dismissal being possible on the material before the Tribunal, the Judgment of the Tribunal is that the claim is well founded and succeeds. The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant £9,003.13, calculated as follows: (b) Basic award £4282.50 (c) Compensatory awarda. Loss of wages £1500b. Unpaid pension contributions £120c. Loss of statutory rights £600 (d) Unpaid annual leave £300 (e) Uplift for failure to comply with ACAS code £1800.63