Mrs J Maikhami and Mr P Neampan v Ropley Thai Lounge Ltd: 1403437/2019 and 1403440/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]Both Claimants’ claims of unfair dismissal are well founded.[2]The Respondent failed to provide written particulars of employment to either Claimant, as required by section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Remedy – first claimant - Mrs J Maikhami[3]The first claimant is entitled to a basic award for unfair dismissal of £844.12.[4]The respondent is ordered to pay the first claimant a compensatory award for unfair dismissal of £580.80, made up as follows: Case Numbers: 1403437/2019 & 1403440/2019a. Loss of statutory rights £400.00;b. Pension losses £106.80; andc. Accommodation expenses £74.00.[5]By virtue of section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal increases the first claimant’s award by £844.12. Remedy – Second claimant – Mr P Neampan[6]The second Claimant is entitled to a basic award for unfair dismissal of £1,575.00.[7]The Respondent is ordered to pay the second Claimant a compensatory award for unfair dismissal of £652.25, made up as follows:a. Loss of statutory rights £400.00;b. Pension losses £186.24; andc. Vehicle rental £66.01.[8]By virtue of section 38(3) of the Employment Act 2002, the tribunal increases the second claimant’s award by £1,050.00.