Mrs J Bradbury v Mr M Rennolds: 1403384/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The complaint of discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy / maternity is dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. The claimant’s remaining claims relating to alleged unpaid holiday and pay will proceed to a Hearing on 12 April 2019. _____________________________ Employment Judge Goraj 21 February 2019[2]Case No:1403384/2018 6.9 Judgment on Withdrawal – part - rule 52 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS[3]Case no 1403384/2018 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Mrs J Bradbury Respondent Mr M Rennolds Heard at: Exeter On: 12 April 2019 Before: Employment Judge Goraj Representation Claimant: in person The Respondent: in person (supported by Mrs S Rennolds)[5]The JUDGMENT of the tribunal is that: - By consent, the parties have agreed that the Respondent will pay the Claimant £205 in full and final settlement of any claims against the Respondent and further that such monies will be paid to the Claimant within 14 days of the date of the Hearing. ________________________ Employment Judge Goraj Date: 16 April 2019 Case no 1403384/2018 2 As reasons for the Judgment were announced orally at the Hearing written reasons shall not be provided unless they are requested by a party within 14 days of the sending of this Judgment to the parties. Online publication of judgments and reasons The Employment Tribunal (ET) is required to maintain a register of all judgments and written reasons. The register must be accessible to the public. It has recently been moved online. All judgments and reasons since February 2017 are now available at: https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions The ET has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in anyway prior to publication, you will need to apply to the ET for an order to that effect under Rule 50 of the ET’s Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to be copied to all other parties for comment and it would be carefully scrutinised by a judge (where appropriate, with panel members) before deciding whether (and to what extent) anonymity should be granted to a party or a witness