Miss L Nicholls v Defence Business Services: 1402921/2021
JUDGMENT
Rule 76(1)(a) and (c) and (2) The respondent acted unreasonably as detailed in the case management record of 20 September 2023 and is Ordered to pay the claimant her time preparation costs, summarily assessed at £2771.60 ____________________________ Employment Judge Midgley Date 5 December 2023 Judgment sent to the Parties on 21 December 2023 For the Tribunal Office Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case No: 1402921/2021 10.2 Judgment - rule 61 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms L Nicholls Respondent: Ministry of Defence Heard at: Bristol Employment Tribunal On: 11-22 March 2024 Before: Employment Judge Ferguson Members: Mr H Launder Ms L Fellows Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms S Garner, counsel JUDGMENT It is the unanimous judgment of the Tribunal that:[1]The complaint of direct sex discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed.[2]The complaint of direct age discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed[3]The complaint of direct disability discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed.[4]The complaint of harassment related to sex and/or age is not well-founded and is dismissed.[5]The complaint of victimisation is not well-founded and is dismissed. Case No: 1402921/2021 10.2 Judgment - rule 61