Mr A Gould v Mullins Group Ltd and Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy and others: 1402692/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The Respondent does not defend the claim that it has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £1,000. Employment Judge Gray Date: 16 September 2019 Judgment sent to parties: 17 September 2019 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE[2]Case No: 1402692/2019 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Gould Respondent: Mullins Group Limited (in voluntary creditors’ liquidation)[4]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,000. Employment Judge Oliver _____________________________ Date: 17 April 2020[5]JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON ………………………………………………… FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE[6]1402692/2019 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A Gould Respondent: Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy & OthersREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 18 January 2021 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The claim is therefore struck out.