Mr M Stacey v Metatech Capital Ltd: 1402356/2022

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1402356/2022
Mr M StaceyClaimantMetatech Capital LtdRespondent
Employment Judge LiveseyDate 18 October 2022

JUDGMENT

The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.

REASONS

[1]The Claimant complains of unfair dismissal. Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[2]The Claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years and is therefore not entitled to bring such a complaint.[3]The Claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out. Accordingly, it is struck out.[4]The Claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. _____________________________ Employment Judge Livesey Date: 10 August 2022[1]The claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 22 July 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £2,209.84 net.[3]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £2,833.33 gross.[4]The respondent breached the contract of the claimant by failing to pay expenses in the net sum of £1594.34.[5]The respondent breached the contract of the claimant by failing to pay non-fungible tokens in the net sum of £5,709.60.[6]The respondent breached the contract of the claimant by failing to pay a bonus in the net sum of £10,000.[7]The respondent must pay the claimant £22,347.11 in total.[8]The hearing listed on 7 December 2022 is vacated.