Ms I Dworak and others v R&M Wilk Ltd: 1402235/2022 and others
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 13 July 2022. The Respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure. Claimant 1: Ms Dworak[2]The Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the Respondent must pay damages to the Claimant of £1,247.40.[3]The Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,247.40.[4]The Respondent has failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the Claimant £997.92[5]The Respondent must pay the Claimant £3,492.72 in total. Claimant 2: Ms Nowicka 2. The Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the Respondent must pay damages to the Claimant of £427.68. 3. The Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £427.68. 4. The Respondent has failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the Claimant £798.33 5. The Respondent must pay the Claimant £1,653.69 in total. Claimant 3: Ms Lesniewska 2. The Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the Respondent must pay damages to the Claimant of £1,247.40. 3. The Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,247.40. 4. The Respondent has failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the Claimant £997.92 5. The Respondent must pay the Claimant £3,492.72 in total.