Mr I Bakalov v Eco Cleaning Gloucestershire Ltd: 1402143/2020
JUDGMENT
The response is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 20 April 2021 the Tribunal gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the response should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The respondent has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The response is therefore struck out.[3]The respondent will be entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions of the Tribunal but will only be entitled to participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. Employment Judge Livesey Date: 19 May 2021 Judgment and Reasons sent to the Parties: 26 May 2021 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case No. 1402143/2020 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS BETWEEN Claimant Respondent Mr I Bakalov AND Eco Cleaning Gloucestershire Limited[1]The claimant’s claim for breach of contract succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant one week’s notice pay in the net sum of £319.50; and[2]The claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant two weeks’ pay in the sum of £639.00; and[3]The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeds and the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £252.00; and[4]The claimant has confirmed that he has no further claims, and to the extent (which is not clear) that there are any claims relating to protected public interest disclosures, any such claims are hereby dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.