Mr P D James v James Cox: 1402092/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The judgment of the tribunal is that the claim is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[2]All claims were out of time. It was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented within the applicable time limits. _____________________ Employment Judge Emerton Date 19 October 2018 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case Number: 1402092/2018 1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL SITTING AT: SOUTHAMPTON BEFORE: EMPLOYMENT JUDGE EMERTON (sitting alone) BETWEEN: Mr P D James Claimant AND James Cox Respondent ON: 19 October 2018 APPEARANCES: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Did not attend and was not represented[1]The judgment of the tribunal is that the claim is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[2]All claims were out of time. It was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented within the applicable time limits. _____________________ Employment Judge Emerton Date 19 October 2018 Note Reasons for the judgment having been given orally at the hearing, written reasons will not be provided unless a request was made by either party at the hearing or a written request is presented by either party within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision. Case Number: 1402092/2018 1 THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL SITTING AT: SOUTHAMPTON BEFORE: EMPLOYMENT JUDGE EMERTON (sitting alone) BETWEEN: Mr P D James Claimant AND James Cox Respondent ON: 19 October 2018 APPEARANCES: For the Claimant: In person For the Respondent: Did not attend and was not represented[1]The judgment of the tribunal is that the claim is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[2]All claims were out of time. It was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented within the applicable time limits.