Mr B Steuart v Vital Pet Products and others: 1402009/2018

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1402009/2018Venue CHAMBERS AT PlymouthHearing 29 January 2019 THE THIRD RESPONDENT’S TIME FOR PRESENTING A RESPONSE HAVING EXPIRED AND NO VALID RESPONSE HAVING BEEN PRESENTED JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 21 1. The claimant’s claims are dismissed as against the first respondent and the second respondent; and 2. The claimant was unfairly dismissed by the third respondent; and 3. The claimant’s claim for breach of contract succeeds as against the third respondent in respect of five months’ notice pay; and 4. The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeds as against the third respondent; and 5. The appropriate remedy will be determined at the hearing already listed on 18 March 2019.
Between
Mr B SteuartClaimantVital Pet Products and othersRespondent
Before
Employment Judge N J Roper DatedDate 29 January 2019

JUDGMENT

[1]The claimant’s claims are dismissed as against the first respondent and the second respondent; and[2]The claimant was unfairly dismissed by the third respondent; and[3]The claimant’s claim for breach of contract succeeds as against the third respondent in respect of five months’ notice pay; and[4]The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeds as against the third respondent; and[5]The appropriate remedy will be determined at the hearing already listed on 18 March 2019.