Miss L Parson v Day to Day Property Maintenance Ltd: 1401745/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]By a letter dated 19 October 2019 the Tribunal gave the Respondent an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing as to why its response to the claims of unpaid holiday pay should not be struck out because it had failed to comply with the Tribunal’s case management orders of 2 August and 24 September 2019, and/or was not actively pursuing its response.[2]The Respondent has failed to make representations in writing why this should not be done or to request a hearing.[3]The response is therefore struck out.[4]The claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid annual leave is well founded and succeeds.[5]The claimant shall provide the Tribunal with a calculation identifying the sum claimed for unpaid annual leave, specifying the sum claimed as a day’s pay and the calculation used to determine a day’s pay. Employment Judge Midgley Date: 12 November 2019 Judgment sent to parties: 13 November 2019 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case no: 1401745/2019 6.2 Strike out Judgment – claim - rule 37 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss L Parsons Respondent: Day to Day Property Maintenance LtdREASONS
[1]By a letter dated 20 December 2020 the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the claim should not be struck out because it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing why this should not be done or to request a hearing.[3]The claim is therefore struck out.