Mr R J Davis v Talick Group Ltd: 1401368/2022
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Employment Judge Livesey Date: 20 may 2022 Judgment sent to the parties: 01 June 2022 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 1401368/2022 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr R J Davis Respondent: Talick Group Ltd[1]The claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 14 April 2022. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £24,999.99[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £1,442.32[4]The respondent must pay the claimant £26,442.31 in total.[5]The remedy hearing listed on 23 September 2022 is vacated.