Mr A Badru v JAKK Security & Facility Managmenet Ltd: 1401267/2023
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 24 March 2023. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure.[2]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant £87 gross.[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £543.25 gross.[4]The respondent must pay the claimant £630.25 in total.[5]It is not understood that the Claimant is saying he is owed sick pay; rather that he was made to work when ill. Accordingly, the hearing listed is cancelled.[6]The Claimant may apply to restore a hearing on sick pay for any day unworked if he submits a basis for it and a calculation of it within 7 days of this Judgment being sent to the parties. Employment Judge Smail Date: 18 May 2023 Judgment sent to the Parties on 02 June 2023 For the Tribunal Office Case No: 1401267/2023 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr Adeyeinka Bidru Respondent: JAKK Security & Facility Management Limited Heard at: Bristol (via VHS) On: 28.07.2023 Before: Employment Judge David Hughes Representation Claimant: In person Respondent: Ms Kerry Davis, company secretary[1]The Respondent’s request for reconsideration of the Rule 21 Judgment of 18.05.2023 is treated as an application for an extension of time for presenting a response.[2]The Respondent’s application for an extension of time for presenting a response is refused.[3]The Judgment issued under Rule 21 is not varied or revoked.