S Smith and D Frost v Skyline Roofs Ltd: 1401228/2025 and 1401229/2025

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1401228/2025, 1401229/2025
(1) Samuel Smith (2) David FrostClaimantSkyline Roofs LimitedRespondent
Employment Judge Beever, sitting aloneIn person for claimantMr Hamid (instructed by counsel) for respondentDate 20 May 2026

JUDGMENT

[1]It is declared that the Claimants were employees of the Respondent within the meaning of section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996[2]The Claimants’ claim of unfair dismissal, contrary to section 94 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, is well founded and succeeds.[3]The Claimants are entitled to the following award consequent upon the unfair dismissal in .2 above: Claimant: Samuel Smith 3.1. A Basic Award: 6 years x £700, amounting to £4,200 3.2. A Compensatory Award, amounting to 13 weeks’ loss of earnings, in the agreed sum of £11,297 3.3. Compensation for Loss of Statutory Rights, in the sum of £500 Claimant: David Frost 3.4. A Basic Award: 14 years x £700, amounting to £9,800 3.5. A Compensatory Award, amounting to 13 weeks’ loss of earnings, in the agreed sum of £10,029 3.6. Compensation for Loss of Statutory Rights, in the sum of £500 1 of 2 Case Number: 1401228/2025 & 1401229/2025[4]The Claimants’ claim for unpaid holiday pay, contrary to the Working Time Regulations 1998, is well founded and succeeds.[5]The Claimants are entitled to the following award consequent upon the claim in .4 above Claimant: Samuel Smith 5.1. An award, amounting to 8 weeks’ pay, in the agreed sum of £6,952 Claimant: David Frost 5.2. An award, amounting to 8 weeks’ pay, in the agreed sum of £6,168