U Loveless and others v Chocobake Ltd: 1401155/2024
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The claim was issued in the Employment Tribunals Bristol on 22.03.2024. The respondent has failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge has decided that a determination can properly be made of the claim, or part of it, in accordance with rule 21 of the Rules of Procedure. Claimant: U Loveless - 1401155/2024[1]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant for Pension £40 gross.[2]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £1,050.00.[3]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £175.00.[4]The respondent must pay the claimant £1,265.00 in total. Claimant: C Le Feaux – 1400675/2024[5]The Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £1,145.00.[6]The Claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,433.00.[7]The Respondent has failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £171.60.[8]The Respondent must pay the claimant £5,749.60 in total. Claimant: S Longworth – 1400662/2024[9]The respondent has made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and must pay the claimant for Pension £27.30 gross.[10]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent must pay damages to the claimant of £1,260.00.[11]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £1,890.00.[12]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and must pay the claimant £210.00.[13]The respondent must pay the claimant £3,387.30 in total.