Miss S A Pitman v PMP Recruitment Ltd: 1401119/2018
JUDGMENT
The Claimant's claim for unfair dismissal is dismissed because the Employment Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider it. ORDERS (Made pursuant to the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013)[1]Adding a respondent Amazon UK Services Limited shall be joined as the Second Respondent to these proceedings and the title to the proceedings shall be amended accordingly. A copy of the Originating Claim, the Response by the First Respondent, a copy of this Case Management Summary, Judgment and Order and the Claimant's Further Information and Disability Impact Statement shall be served on the Second Respondent which shall be entitled to make a response to these proceedings within 28 days of service of these documents by the Tribunal.[2]Amended response The First Respondent shall have leave to file an amendment of / addition to its Response so as to deal with the matters raised in the Claimant's Further Information and Disability Impact Statement, if so advised, which must be sent to the Tribunal no later than 14 days after receipt of the Claimant's Further Information and Disability Impact Statement.[3]Further information The Claimant is ordered to provide the following Further Information in relation to her claim to the First Respondent and the Tribunal, on or before, 15 August 2018: Full details of all matters upon which the Claimant relies in support of the allegations that the Respondents discriminated against the Claimant by reason of her disability which shall include: a) All particular incidents relied upon and the dates of those incidents; b) the persons involved; and c) all matters said or done which give rise to the complaints and any witnesses to those matters.[4]Disability impact statement The Claimant shall on or before 15 August 2018 provide a Disability Impact Statement which shall be sent to the Tribunal and the Respondents which shall set out factual matters relevant to that issue which shall include what effect on day to day activities her medical conditions of osteoarthritis and carpel tunnel syndrome have had on her over the relevant period that is from April 2017 to the termination of her employment with the First Respondent. NOTES – Consequences of non-compliance(1) Failure to comply with an order for disclosure may result on summary conviction in a fine of up to £1,000 being imposed upon a person in default under s.7(4) of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996.(2) Further, if this Order is not complied with, the Tribunal may (a) make an Order for costs or preparation time against the defaulting party, or (b) strike out the whole or part of the claim, or, as the case may be, the response, and, where appropriate, direct that the respondent be debarred from responding to the claim altogether.(3) The tribunal may also make a further order (an “unless order) providing that unless it is complied with, the claim or, as the case may be, the response shall be struck out on the date of non-compliance without further consideration of the proceedings or the need to give notice or hold a preliminary hearing or a hearing.(4) An order may be varied or revoked upon application by a person affected by the order or by a judge on his/her own initiative.