Mr A White v KT Building Ltd: 1401090/2021

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1401090/2021
Mr A WhiteClaimantKT Building LtdRespondent
Employment Judge RaynerIn person for claimantMr Richard Crook (instructed by representative) for respondentDate 10 June 2021

JUDGMENT

The complaint that the Claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.

REASONS

[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The Claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the Claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The Claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The Claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this Judgment. Employment Judge Rayner Date: 19 May 2021 Judgment sent to the parties: 20 May 2021 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 1401090/2021 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. 01/01/14 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A White Respondent: KT Building Ltd[1]The Claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the Respondent is ordered to pay damages to him in the net sum of £623.08.[2]The Respondent has failed to pay the Claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay him the sum of £2,250. Employment Judge Livesey Date: 10 June 2021 Judgment sent to the Parties: 30 June 2021 FOR THE TRIBUNAL OFFICE Case Number: 1401090/2021 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr A White Respondent: KT Building Ltd Heard at: Bristol (by video) On: 3 February 2022 Before: Employment Judge Le Grys Appearances For the Claimant: In Person For the Respondent: Mr Richard Crook (representative)