Ms Sullivan v Solent Composite Systems Ltd and Solent Composite Solutions Ltd: 1400771/2019
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimants work was equal to that of her comparator Mr C Bernson in that it was like work.[2]The first Respondent will pay the claimant the total sum of £9113.24, comprising £9008.87 net as compensation for past pay inequality and the sum of £104.37 for expenses of copying and associated costs incurred in bringing the claim.[3]The claimants claim against the 2nd Respondent is dismissed. Employment Judge Rayner Dated: 7 February 2020 ……………………………………. Case Number: 1400771/2019 Note: online publication of judgments and reasons The ET is required to maintain a register of all judgments and written reasons. The register must be accessible to the public. It has recently been moved online. All judgments and reasons since February 2017 are now available at: https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. The ET has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in any way prior to publication, you will need to apply to the ET for an order to that effect under Rule 50 of the ET's Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to be copied to all other parties for comment and it would be carefully scrutinised by a judge (where appropriate, with panel members) before deciding whether (and to what extent) anonymity should be granted to a party or a witness