S T Marsh v Paradigm Human Performance Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade: 1400496/2025 S T Marsh v Paradigm Human Performance Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) and Secretary of State for Business and Trade: 1400496/2025
JUDGMENT
The judgment of the Tribunal is as follows: Time Limits[1]The complaint of breach of contract was not presented within the applicable time limit, but it was not reasonably practicable to do so. The complaint was presented within a further reasonable period. The complaint will therefore proceed.[2]Neither a claim for a redundancy payment, nor a claim for unfair dismissal, was made to the Tribunal within the six months following the Claimant’s dismissal. A claim was also not made to the First Respondent within the same period. However, the claim for a redundancy payment was presented to the Tribunal during the six months immediately thereafter, and it is just and equitable for the Claimant to receive a redundancy payment. Case number: 1400496/2025 Notice Pay[3]The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded.[4]The First Respondent shall pay the Claimant £1,054.79 as damages for breach of contract. This figure has been calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant will have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. Redundancy Payment[5]Under section 163 Employment Rights Act 1996 it is determined that the Claimant is entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,536.50. Other Complaints[6]The Claimant’s claims for holiday pay, arrears of pay and pension contributions were withdrawn and are dismissed.