Mrs B Simi-Bridgman v Eyemouth International Sailing Craft Association Ltd (EISCA): 1400415/2017
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 The respondent having indicated that it does not defend the claim and on the information before the Employment Judge,[1]The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £1960.00.[2]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the net sum of £2940.00.[3]The claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £4076.50 (representing 15 years service, one of which was when aged over 41 years at the relevant date at her gross weekly pay of £263.00).[4]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the net sum of £490.00.[5]The respondent is ordered to pay costs to the claimant under Rule 75(1)(b) in the sum of £160.00 in respect of the issue fee paid by the claimant in these proceedings.[6]The hearing listed on 19 May 2017 is cancelled. 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. 01/01/14 Case No: 1400415/17