Miss C Geng and Others v Kinder Active Limited: 1400292/19 and Others
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21 Second Claimant (Miss Martinez)[1]The Respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay her the gross sum of £1,407.35. Third Claimant (Miss Vera)[2]The Respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay her the gross sum of £1,889.16. Forth Claimant (Mrs Prinsloo)[3]The Respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay her the net sum of £1,808.18. Fifth Claimant (Miss Pokryzk)[4]The Respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay her the gross sum of £725.00. Sixth Claimant (Miss Womble)[5]The Respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant's wages and is ordered to pay her the gross sum of £2,520 (£8/hr x 315 hrs). Employment Judge Livesey 13 May 2019 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss C Geng Respondent: Kinder Active Limited[1]Under Rule 21, the respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £965.89.[2]The complaint of discrimination of the grounds of race or ethnic origin is struck out.REASONS
[1]By a letter dated 5 March 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing, as to why the complaint of discrimination of the grounds of race or ethnic origin should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the Order of the Tribunal dated 14 February 2019 and it has not been actively pursued.[2]The claimant has failed to make representations in writing, or has failed to make any sufficient representations, why this should not be done or to request a hearing. The complaint of discrimination of the grounds of race or ethnic origin is therefore struck out.