Mr J O'Neill v Frontx Ltd: 1400260/2024

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1400260/2024Venue CHAMBERS AT PlymouthHearing 9 August 2024 THE TIME FOR PRESENTING A RESPONSE HAVING EXPIRED AND NO VALID RESPONSE HAVING BEEN PRESENTED JUDGMENT UNDER RULE 21 - REMEDY The claimant’s claim for unlawful deduction from wages is well-founded. The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the total gross sum of £18,314.51, which consists of unpaid wages of £9,174.72 gross for October, November and December 2023, and £9,139.79 gross for January, February and March 2024. ________________________
Between
Mr J O'NeillClaimantFRONTX LTDRespondent
Before
Employment Judge RaynerDate 9 August 2024

JUDGMENT

The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.

REASONS

[1]The claimant complains of unfair dismissal.[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. _____________________________ Employment Judge Rayner Date: 10 May 2024