Mr G Walker v Cricklade and District Community Association: 1400224/2018
JUDGMENT
[1]The Claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal does not succeed and is dismissed.[2]The Claimant’s claim for a redundancy payment does not succeed and is dismissed.[3]The claim for wrongful dismissal was withdrawn by the Claimant at the start of the hearing and is dismissed upon withdrawal.[4]No order is made for costs.REASONS
[1]I have considered the claimant’s email of 3 June 2018 as an application for reconsideration because written reasons were requested at the hearing, and these were not sent to the parties until 12 June 2018. The application is therefore made within time in accordance with Rule 71.[2]There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, because the claimant has not raised any matters which indicate that it could be in the interests of justice to reconsider the judgment.a. The claimant had a full opportunity at the full to express his case at the full hearing, and any failure by him to do so is not a reason to reconsider the judgment.b. The claimant says that he has evidence that the witnesses misled the court, but has not provided any detail about the allegation. The full hearing provided a full opportunity for the evidence of all the witnesses to be tested.[3]The claimant has asked whether the still has the option to appeal. The time limit for an appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal is 42 days from when the full written reasons were sent to the parties. The Tribunal is unable to 11.6C Judgment – Reconsideration refused – claimant - rule 72 Case No: 1400224/2018 advise further on the process for making an appeal, but the claimant is reminded that appeals can only be brought on a question of law.