Miss T Farkas v DHL Services Ltd: 1309585/2022
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years’ service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Signed electronically by Employment Judge Power 26 May 2023 Case No: 1309585/2022 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Ms T Farkas Respondent: DHL Services Limited Heard at: Midlands West On: 9 February and 25 March 2024 Before: Employment Judge Faulkner Representation: Claimant - in person Respondent - Ms H Ifeka (Counsel)[1]The Respondent did not fail to pay the Claimant for annual leave taken on 9 and 10 July 2022. The Claimant’s complaint pursuant to regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 is dismissed accordingly.[2]The Respondent did not make an unauthorised deduction from the Claimant’s wages. Her complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages is accordingly not well-founded.[3]The Respondent did not dismiss the Claimant in breach of contract. Her complaint of breach of contract is therefore dismissed. Note: This Hearing was conducted remotely. The parties did not object to the case being heard remotely. The form of remote hearing was video.