Employment Judge AlgazyIn person for claimantMs. L.Green - Paralegal for respondentDate 29 March 2023
JUDGMENT
Upon the respondent having paid the claimant his outstanding Notice Pay The judgment of the Tribunal is that:[1]The remaining claims before the Tribunal are not well founded and are dismissed. Case Number:1308991/2022 Oral reasons having been given, the parties are reminded of Rule 62(3) of Schedule 1 of the 2013 Rules regarding written reasons not being produced unless requested and/or subsequently requested in accordance with Rule 62(3). Jacques Algazy K.C. Electronically Signed by EJ Algazy KC On 29 March 2023
REASONS
There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, because:[1]The claimant has not explained why it is necessary in the interests of justice to reconsider the judgment; and/or because[2]The claimant has not identified any, or any proper, grounds for establishing any reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked.[3]In arriving at the Judgment above, the Tribunal has searched and reviewed the case papers that were presented to the Tribunal for the Hearing on 29 March 2023. The claims were dismissed as: a) The only claim within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction was a potential claim for financial compensation under Section 24(2) Case Number:1309881/2022 Employment Rights Act 1996 but the claimant was unable to produce any evidence in support of such claim; and b) The claimant appeared to be seeking remedies only available in a claim for unfair dismissal and such claim had been dismissed by a Judgment dated 29 November 2022; and c) There was no other justiciable claim before the Tribunal. Electronically Signed by EJ Algazy KC On 9 May 2024