K Vachon v Vibha Samani Health and Beauty: 1308547/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The complaint that the respondent failed to deal with the claimant’s request to vary her hours of work in a reasonable manner by refusing an extension of time in which to appeal is well-founded and succeeds.[2]The respondent shall pay the claimant the sum of £1003.56 which equates to 4 weeks’ pay in respect of the above.[3]The complaint of indirect sex discrimination is not well-founded and is dismissed.[4]The remaining complaint that the respondent failed to deal with the claimant’s request to vary her hours of work in a reasonable manner by failing to consider her childcare or breastfeeding needs is not well-founded and is dismissed.[5]The complaint that the respondent’s decision to reject the claimant’s application to vary her hours was based on incorrect facts is not well-founded and is dismissed.[6]The complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability is not well-founded and is dismissed 1 of 2 Case No: 1308547/2023[7]The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent is not well-founded and is dismissed.[8]The complaint of direct sex discrimination is dismissed upon withdrawal. Employment Judge Connolly 20 November 2024 Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.