Mr N Moseley v Staffordshire Cleaning (D Robson): 1307306/2019
JUDGMENT
Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]This has been a remote hearing which has not been objected to by the parties. The form of remote hearing was V, Cloud Video Platform (CVP). A face to face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all issues could be determined in a remote hearing.[2]The Claimant failed to attend or be represented at the Hearing. The Respondent had been sent the Notice of Hearing for information only due to non-presentation of a response to the claim. The Tribunal considered the information in its possession. The claim is dismissed.