Mr D Evboumwan v Regent Office Care Ltd: 1306227/2020
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s claims fail and are dismissed.REASONS
There is no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked, because it appears that the reconsideration application is an attempt by the claimant to reargue the case. The claimant’s application is based upon expanding upon points which were raised and considered at the hearing or raising arguments which could and/or should have been deployed at the hearing. The application reads as though the claimant has taken the opportunity to make further submissions following the judgment. It is not in the interests of justice to reconsider a judgment on that basis. I have considered all of the matters raised by the claimant and none of them are such that they would give any reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. The parties and the interests of justice are best served by finality of litigation and in particular confirming the Tribunal’s judgment. The claimant had the opportunity to raise, give evidence, ask questions and make submissions on all the issues which he now wishes to expand upon at the hearing. Overall, the claimant’s application is an attempt to re-argue the issues because he disagrees with the decision. This is not a valid ground for a reconsideration.