Mr Z Zahid v Jaguar Land Rover Ltd: 1305944/2024
JUDGMENT
RECITAL UPON there being no attendance from the Claimant and upon the Tribunal making enquiries in order to determine whether the Claimant was planning to attend but receiving no response to either a telephone call or email. AND UPON the Tribunal deciding to proceed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended) 2013 in the Claimant’s absence. The judgment of the Tribunal is that:[1]The Claimant’s claim is struck out pursuant to rule 37 (1) (a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended) (2013) on the Case No. 1305944/2024