Mr Z Zahid v Jaguar Land Rover Ltd: 1305140/2024
JUDGMENT
RECITAL UPON there being no attendance from the Claimant and upon the Tribunal making enquiries in order to determine whether the Claimant was planning to attend but receiving no response to either a telephone call or email; AND UPON the Tribunal deciding to proceed pursuant to rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended) 2013 in the Claimant’s absence; The judgment of the Tribunal is that: Case No. 1305140/2024 JUDGMENT[1]The Claimant’s claim is struck out pursuant to rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (as amended) (2013) on the grounds that the Tribunal finds that it has not been actively pursued. Employment Judge MANLEY 24/10/24 Note Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. Written reasons will not be provided unless a party asked for them at the hearing or a party makes a written request within 14 days of the sending of this written record of the decision.