Mr T Sharma v Tamatanga Ltd (In Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation): 1304536/2020
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Employment Judge Broughton 16 June 2020 Case No: 1304536/2020 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondent Mr T Sharma v Birmingham Tamatanga Limited[1]The correct respondent is “Birmingham Tamatanga Limited”. I join that company to the proceedings, and I dismiss “Tamatanga Limited (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation)”, which liquidation was completed on 17 April 2015 and was dissolved on 7 August 2015.[2]The claimant has not proven his claims of unpaid wages, breach of contract by lack of notice, and unpaid holiday pay.[3]I therefore dismiss the claimant’s claims in their entirety.