Miss S Ashby v Qube Learning and Secretary of State for Business and Trade: 1303307/2023

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1303307/2023
Miss Stephenie AshbyClaimantQube LearningRespondent
Date 10 March 2025

JUDGMENT

The Claim for a redundancy payment is struck out.

REASONS

[1]The claimant claims the right to a redundancy payment.[2]Section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 says the employees do not have the right to a redundancy payment unless they have been employed for two years or more.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore, the claimant does not have the right to a redundancy payment.[5]The claimant was given the opportunity to explain why the claim for a redundancy payment should not be struck out but has not given an acceptable reason.[6]Accordingly, the claim for a redundancy payment is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgement.[1]The respondent’s premises at Bee House, 140 Eastern Avenue, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 4SB constituted an establishment for the purpose of s188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“TULR(C)A”).[2]There was no recognised trade union or appointed or elected employee representatives for the purpose of s188(1B) if TULR(C)A.[3]The complaint that the respondent failed to comply with a requirement of s188 of TULR(C)A is upheld.[4]The Tribunal makes a protective award in favour of the claimant.[5]The respondent is ordered to pay to the claimant remuneration for the protected period of 90 days (or 12.86 weeks) beginning on 28 March 2023 of £6,430. Notice pay[6]The complaint of breach of contract in relation to notice pay is well-founded.[7]The respondent shall pay the claimant £2000 as damages for breach of contract (equivalent of 4 weeks’ pay). This figure has been calculated using net pay. Credit[8]Credit is to be given for sums paid by the Redundancy Payments Service in relation to notice pay.[9]To the extent the claimant sought to bring any other claims, those are dismissed as the claimant has not satisfied the tribunal that any other payments are due. Approved by: