Mr M A Firdaus v Al Rayan Bank plc and Others: 1302904/2022
JUDGMENT
The claimant’s allegations at 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 3.9, 3.13. 3.15 and 5.2.5 set out in the list of issues in EJ Wedderspoon’s case management order of 13 February 2023 are struck out.REASONS
[1]The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £300 per allegation (a total of £2400) following a preliminary hearing held on 27 September 2023. The order was sent to the claimant on 4 October 2023. The claimant has failed to pay this deposit. The relevant allegations are therefore struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.[2]The hearings remain listed as per my case management order and any variation to the listing of the final hearing can be discussed at the preliminary hearing in March . Employment Judge Meichen 16 November 2023 Claim Number 1302904/2022 1 / 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant Respondents Mr M A Firdaus v Al Rayan Bank Plc & Others[1]Further to the provisional assessment of the first respondent’s costs the outcome of which was sent to the parties on 11 December 2025 I have considered the representations from both parties concerning the provisional assessment.[2]The first respondent seeks I confirm the sums as provisionally assessed.[3]The claimant objects to the assessment setting out what in my view are a repeat of matters raised previously. That being so the assessment is confirmed.13 approved by me Employment Judge Perry Dated: 28 January 2026 All judgments (apart from those under rule 52) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. The Employment Tribunal has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in any way prior to publication, you will need to apply to the Employment Tribunal for an order to that effect under Rule 50 of the Employment Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to be copied to all other parties for comment.