Mr D Gatley v Apollo Buckingham Health Sciences Campus Ltd: 1302169/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]Pursuant to Section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant’s dismissal by the respondent was not automatically unfair. The claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal is not well-founded and is dismissed.[2]Pursuant to Section 44 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the claimant’s claim for detriment is not well-founded and is dismissed.[3]The respondent did not, at any time material to this claim, act towards the claimant in contravention of Section 39 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant’s claims for direct sex discrimination and vistimisation, pursuant to Section 120 of that Act, are dismissed.[4]The respondent did not, at any time material to this claim, act towards the claimant in contravention of Section 40 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant’s claim for harassment, pursuant to Section 120 of that Act, is dismissed.