Miss M Furdui v Nexohc Ltd: 1301988/2022
JUDGMENT
The complaint that the claimant was unfairly dismissed is struck out.REASONS
[2]Section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 requires a claimant to have not less than two years service to make an unfair dismissal complaint.[3]The claimant was employed by the respondent for less than two years.[4]Therefore the claimant is not entitled to bring such a complaint.[5]The claimant has failed to give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity to do so, why the complaint should not be struck out.[6]Accordingly, the complaint of unfair dismissal is struck out. The claimant’s other complaints are not affected by this judgment. Employment Judge Harding 13 August 2022 Case Number: 1301988/2022 V 1 of 1 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Miss M Furdui Respondent: Nexohc Limited The claimant’s claims are dismissed.[2]Further to a preliminary hearing on 10 May 2023 which the claimant failed to attend, the Tribunal informed the parties that it was considering dismissing the claimant’s claim because of her failure to attend the hearing and comply with Tribunal orders. The Tribunal ordered that, by 7 June 2023, the claimant must explain why her claim should not be dismissed.[3]The claimant has failed to provide any such explanation to the Tribunal.[4]The claimant’s claims are dismissed under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure because of the claimant’s failure to comply with an order of the Employment Tribunal and because the claims have not been actively pursued.