Mr C Jukes v Berkeley Oakmont Ltd: 1301049/2019

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Case No 1301049/2019
Mr C JukesClaimantBerkeley Oakmont LtdRespondent
Employment Judge HindmarchDate 19 June 2019

JUDGMENT

Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 – Rule 21[1]The complaint of failure to pay notice pay is well founded and is upheld.[2]The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages is well founded and is upheld.[3]The complaint of unlawful deductions is well founded and is upheld. Employment Judge Hindmarch 7 June 2019 Case No:1301049/2019 4.17 Rule 21 judgment – universal template. September 2017 EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS Claimant: Mr C Jukes Respondent: Berkeley Oakmont Ltd[1]The claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and the respondent is ordered to pay damages to the claimant in the sum of £673.08.[2]The respondent has failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £815.07. The hearing listed on 2 July 2019 is cancelled.