Mrs S Messi v Hydrafacial UK Ltd: 1300098/2023
JUDGMENT
[1]The claimant’s claim is struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 37(1)(a) because it is scandalous or vexatious.[2]In the alternative it is struck out under that rule because it has no reasonable prospect of success and in the further alternative pursuant to Rule 37(1)(b) because the manner in which the proceedings have been conducted has been scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious. Claim No. 1300098/2023[3]I have issued a directions order in relation to the respondent’s application for costs. Day 2 of this hearing, scheduled for 30 August 2024, is accordingly vacated. Signed by: Employment Judge Perry Signed on: 30 August 2024 All judgments (apart from those under rule 52) and any written reasons for the judgments are published, in full, online at https://www.gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions shortly after a copy has been sent to the claimants and respondents. The Employment Tribunal has no power to refuse to place a judgment or reasons on the online register, or to remove a judgment or reasons from the register once they have been placed there. If you consider that these documents should be anonymised in any way prior to publication, you will need to apply to the Employment Tribunal for an order to that effect under Rule 50 of the Employment Tribunal’s Rules of Procedure. Such an application would need to be copied to all other parties for comment.