Mrs J Kerr v Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health: 106941/2006
JUDGMENT
The claim is struck out under rule 37 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued in terms of rule 37(1)(d).REASONS
[1]The claimant’s solicitors having withdrawn from acting on her behalf, a letter was to sent to her 9 May 2017 on the direction of an Employment Judge asking for confirmation of her intention with regard to this claim.[2]The current occupier of the address provided on ET1 has contacted the Tribunal Office to advise claimant no longer resides at address.[3]No steps have been taken by the claimant to advise the Tribunal of her new address. In the absence of this information the Tribunal cannot communication with the claimant. The Tribunal have been unable to give the claimant notice under Rule 37(2) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.[4]The Tribunal assumes in these circumstances that she no longer wishes to pursue her claim, which is struck out under rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitutions and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.